You've probably heard about the now-infamous Tyra Banks episode on "furry" by now. Here's a link to the whole 5min debacle!
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=X2YF6EKF
http://www.megavideo.com/?v=X2YF6EKF (Sorry for it being MegaVideo... just close any porn popups)
What happened is that this person,
Chewfox, and her mate took it upon themselves to go on national TV, as furries, and tell everyone that all furries have sex in suit, and are therians. Of course, a major dramastorm started, and the predictable /b/-tards came in "for the lulz, yeeerrr".
I think the problem that everyone had was not that she said that
she had sex in suit... rather, it was worded so as to strongly imply that every single furry has a suit, has sex in said suit, and is a therian. Also, she strongly implied that every single fursuit has an SPH and is used for sexual purposes. She gleefully ascribed her very marginalized fetish to the entire fandom at large, and is that going to piss people off? Of course it is!
I feel the worst for the people who suit mostly for public events, birthday parties, etc. Tyra Banks' biggest audience is the stay-at-home mom, and I'm sure that's going to fly real well when Sally Homemaker calls up the suiter she had at her kid's park birthday party last month and asks him why he tried to spread his filth, because "I saw it on Tyra".
I don't buy the whole "it's inevitable so she can say whatever the hell she wants" line, either. That's like the people who think it's inevitable that they'll catch HIV so they actually seek out infected people to have unprotected sex with. It's ridiculous, and it truly happens - why seek out the bottom level?
I've already been stopped by strangers while I wore a tail in public, and asked, "Hey, are you furries? ... do you have sex in your fursuit? I saw it on CSI/MTV". It
does happen. It
will happen more now due to backlash from this show.
As for the ban... FA ToS reserves for admins the right to ban without notice or reason. I'm sure a lot of professional suiters are going to lose out on gigs over this show, and most of those people will not be into fursuit sex, so that could even be considered slander!.. which is also against the FA ToS.
Not everyone who has a suit has sex in it... remember that the people that are into that are likely to stick together, so the numbers would seem inflated to people that already do it. Regardless, I don't want some jerk going before a national audience of tens of millions and telling them all who *I* am. Maybe she was taken out of context somehow (it doesn't seem like it), but her wording almost seemed [i]designed[/i] to try and define all furries at once.
Furry is an incredibly personal thing, and it means something different to everyone, and is certainly not about sex to everyone. Why should people be alright with being lumped together with people whom they have a huge ideological chasm? This is about as helpful for helping people understand the furry fandom as the gay pride parades where everyone wears nothing but leather chaps and has sex in the streets. Is it fun? Sure. Do I want to be associated with it? Absolutely not.